

ISO 17025 sets the benchmark for your laboratory’s technical competence, quality management, and ability to produce reliable results.
While technically not required (more on that later), ISO 17025 is an important standard to meet if you want to be included in a growing global network of accredited labs and earn your customers' trust.
In principle, it seems simple: demonstrate sound quality control practices and reliable results. If your lab is still managing data manually, though, you could have a long road ahead. In this guide, we’ll explain the standard, show you how to meet it, and walk through how a LIMS can support compliance.
ISO 17025 is an internationally recognized standard that specifies requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of laboratories. The latest standard was revised in 2017 and reaffirmed in 2023 and is officially known as ISO/IEC 17025. The revision included updates to IT (information technology) and quality management system processes, as well as a greater emphasis on senior management responsibilities.
ISO 17025 serves as a global benchmark for laboratories wishing to demonstrate their ability to produce reliable results, enhancing confidence in their work nationally and worldwide.
ISO 17025 can be broken down into five basic requirements:
We’ll explore these in greater detail later to guide you through the best practices for each.
No, compliance with ISO 17025 is not mandatory for laboratories, as no governing body, such as the FDA, requires it; however, it is advantageous to comply nonetheless.
If your lab wishes to demonstrate its technical competence and reliability to existing or prospective customers, you could rely on your word, but the phrase “trust us” won’t get you very far compared to being accredited. Some companies go so far as to refuse to work with labs that aren’t ISO accredited, making this well worth the investment from both a business and a compliance perspective.
Beyond earning the respect of companies across the globe and making it easier for potential customers to trust you, there are other benefits of meeting ISO 17025 that are worth mentioning:
Not to mention the actual process of meeting the standard – improving quality control and data management within your lab – will drastically improve your operations, mitigate potential time-wasting errors, and result in smoother operations overall.
ISO 17025 applies to all laboratories engaged in testing, calibration, and sampling activities, regardless of their size, the industry they serve, or the complexity of the analyses they perform. In short, if your lab measures something and wishes to demonstrate the reliability of those measurements, then ISO 17025 matters.
Here are some specific examples of laboratories that need to comply with ISO 17025:
If you wish to demonstrate the reliability of your lab to your customers, there is no better way than to be ISO 17025-accredited.
The ISO/IEC 17025 standard is structured around the following five categories of requirements:
Each category is designed to ensure your lab operates with quality control and produces consistent, valid results. Let’s walk through these sections in depth.
The general requirements for ISO/IEC 17025 center on two core principles.
First, labs must demonstrate impartiality, ensuring that all work is completed without bias. Second, labs must maintain confidentiality to demonstrate that customer information is properly protected. This should already be the case in your lab, but take the time to document and reflect on it when you prepare for accreditation.
The structural requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 cover your lab’s organizational foundation
There must be evidence of a person who has management responsibility for your laboratory. Your lab must also be a legal entity, or part of a legal entity, that is responsible for its testing and calibration activities. Additionally, your lab must define a range of activities and document procedures accordingly.
The resource requirements for ISO/IEC 17025 address your staff training and lab conditions.
Personnel requirements require the lab to document staff competence, including their education and work experience, while maintaining records of their training and ongoing evaluations. Facilities and environmental conditions must be suitable for the activities being performed. Finally, your lab must provide proof that all equipment is validated, calibrated, and checked before use.
The ISO/IEC 17025 process requirements cover operational procedures throughout the testing lifecycle.
This includes things like:
Finally, data control requires the lab to have systems in place to securely store data. Ideally, these should also include audit trails and backups.
The management requirements for ISO/IEC 17025 focus on oversight and continuous improvement. Document control requires labs to establish and implement a system to maintain documents and the scope of their activities. Risk management requires labs to demonstrate their ability to identify, assess, and mitigate risks to procedures and operations. Internal audits must be conducted regularly to ensure ongoing compliance with ISO 17025 standards.
ISO 17025 is deliberately designed not to be prescriptive as to the tools or software you need to meet it; however, by following the above guidelines, we can break our recommendations into the following categories:
This will ultimately depend on your lab, industry, and test types. However, as a rule, we would recommend investing in the following if you haven’t already:
The above will help ensure your lab runs smoothly; they can only go so far when you log and audit data in fallible notebooks or spreadsheets. That’s where software comes in handy, though.
You can only get so far if you manage sample data, inventory, or training records manually. These days, modern labs rely on specialized software to manage data at scale. The two most common options are:
No matter what software you choose, we recommend considering the following:
Between a QMS and a LIMS, we’d recommend a LIMS. In the next section, we’ll share how a LIMS can help you prepare for accreditation.
We mentioned earlier that you need systems in place to manage your lab’s data.
You could use a combination of paper notebooks and spreadsheets, but neither will provide the level of support you need at scale. For that, a LIMS, whether home-grown or cloud-based, will be your best option.
A LIMS will require planning and investment on your part, so is it worth the effort? Absolutely, here’s why:
Of all the benefits of a LIMS over spreadsheets or notebooks, data management and security rank among the top.
Spreadsheets, while digital, are inherently insecure and scale poorly. A LIMS, on the other hand, ensures that all data, from sample receipt to reporting results, is accurately captured and securely stored. With key features like:
You will be able to demonstrate the reliability and trustworthiness of your data across inventory, samples, and test results.
Document control is a crucial management requirement under ISO/IEC 17025.
A LIMS can help here, too, by simplifying how your lab manages documents such as SOPs, calibration records, and QC materials. You can also ensure that only the latest versions are accessible to staff, keeping your team trained on current best practices and demonstrating that level of training when you get accredited.
Method validation is a core technical requirement under ISO/IEC 17025, and a LIMS makes it far easier to manage.
A LIMS facilitates the validation of testing and calibration methods by maintaining detailed records of validation studies, including performance characteristics, uncertainty measurements, and approval status. It can also track personnel qualifications and training records, helping you demonstrate that your team has the technical competence to perform specific tests. When an assessor requests proof that a method was properly validated and that the analyst running it was qualified, your LIMS should have that documentation available for retrieval.
A LIMS can do more than data management; some LIMS offer QA/QC features, too.
A LIMS with a built-in QMS like QBench can do the following:
All keys to demonstrating proper quality control procedures in your lab.
Reporting is where all your lab's work comes together, and it's also where ISO/IEC 17025 specifies requirements for what must be included and how results are presented.
A LIMS can generate accurate, detailed reports that comply with these requirements by pulling in all relevant data (test results, uncertainty values, sample information, and method references) without manual transcription errors.
Beyond report generation, a LIMS can also streamline customer communication by providing clients with secure portal access to view test statuses, download completed reports, and track their samples through your workflow. This level of transparency builds trust with your customers while reducing the back-and-forth emails and phone calls that eat into your team's time.
The specific process you take to meet ISO 17025 standards will largely depend on your lab’s current setup, processes, and software. That said, you can break the accreditation process into the following phases:
You will need to work through the first three on your own, and then reach out to an accrediting body for an on-site audit. We’ll review the steps in more detail below.
Start by evaluating your current processes against the requirements.
This usually involves a formal gap analysis – either internal or with a consultant – that identifies what's missing:
Labs that have never pursued accreditation often underestimate the extent of the foundational work this reveals.
This is where most of your time will be spent.
Once you’ve conducted a gap analysis, it’s time to get to work to implement the suggestions and software if necessary. This means activities like:
The timeline will vary based on the size and scope of your lab; this could take anywhere from a few weeks to several months. Don’t rush this process, though. Taking time here is key to ensuring you pass an audit.
Once you’ve taken the time to audit, improve, and document your processes, it’s time to submit your application to the appropriate accreditation body. In the US, that is typically A2LA or NVLAP, but note that other countries have their own bodies.
The accreditation body reviews the quality manual and supporting documentation before scheduling the on-site assessment; note that this is an assessment of specific methods, parameters, and metrics, not your entire lab. They may request clarifications or additional documents during this phase.
Now it’s time for the moment you’ve been waiting for: the on-site assessment.
Auditors will visit your lab to verify that the documented system matches actual practice. Expect them to interview staff, observe testing procedures, review records, and check equipment. The duration of this visit will depend on the scope and complexity of your lab, so make sure to allocate enough time based on your size and the variety of test methods.
The assessors will then document their findings and raise any nonconformities requiring action. You will need to address these, submit evidence, and wait for a review. Minor findings may be cleared with a simple submission, but major findings may require a follow-up visit.
Once your submission has been approved, congratulations are in order because you will be accredited. Then it’s up to your lab to maintain accreditation through ongoing reviews, typically conducted annually.
Before we close things out, watch out for the following common pitfalls that trip up labs when seeking accreditation.
For a lab seeking to demonstrate its reliability and competence, there is no better standard to meet than ISO 17025.
We’ve covered a lot of ground in this article. You’ve learned the requirements for ISO 17025, the general process for being accredited, how a LIMS can help, and what to watch out for. Now, it’s time for you to take what you’ve learned and put it into practice.
Fill out the form below to download our free ISO 17025 guide. It covers much of the material in this article, so you can share it with your team and begin the accreditation process.